|
|
Post by Colts- Commish on Jul 17, 2013 11:03:36 GMT -5
To Packers-
Antoine Bathea 1 year $1,000,000
Darius Hayward-Bey 3 years, $3,000,000
to Colts-
Jermicheal Finley 3 years, $4,000,000
GB 2014 2nd round draft pick.
|
|
|
|
Post by Packers on Jul 17, 2013 11:04:27 GMT -5
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seahawks on Jul 18, 2013 11:08:47 GMT -5
Not asked but VETO. 2nd highly questionable trade between colts and packers, I'm not going to say the C word but you guys are either working together or grant kidnapped the packers baby and is holding him ransom.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colts- Commish on Jul 18, 2013 11:23:11 GMT -5
hmm lets see- 2012 stats
Hayward-Bey 114 fantasy points
Bathea 104 fantasy points
Finley 108 fantasy points
please tell me how this is remotly close to unfair?
|
|
|
|
Post by Panthers on Jul 18, 2013 11:57:23 GMT -5
Pure fantasy points are irrelevant you have to take into consideration that players position value to the league and respective teams involved. Trading a starter arguably top 5 tight end in the NFL for fantasy bench warmers or respectable backups isn't in the collective fairness of the league and why trades are evaluated. If we could add up points to determine fairness a committee approval would not be necessary
|
|
|
|
Post by Colts- Commish on Jul 18, 2013 12:03:29 GMT -5
Well lets see-
Packers have 4 TE's.
Packers lack a DB- Bathea becomes a starter for them right away and is a big upgrade onw hat they have.
He just happend to be a reserve for me because I have better DB's.
Heyward-Bey is a respectable WR that could have a monster year if he stays healthy with Luck as his QB.
Finley is super overrated- he has tons of potential and has shown glimpses of greatness, but didnt prove anything last year and was less than mediocre.
Trades like this should not be vetoed. You guys dont understand fantasy dynasty leagues if you think trades like this should be vetoed. Everyone pays money for their team- they are entitled to build it any way they like. You can chose to win now, or build to the future. This deal is not going to make or break either team's season. It's a minor deal that hopefully makes both teams better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Panthers on Jul 18, 2013 12:16:46 GMT -5
Your opinion and a fine one to have I disagree based in the facts I see. I don't see it as a competitive equalizer and to pass up his best TE within his own division and to not get someone of equal importance to your lineup. GBs defense is suspect at best except for a couple players so I see a decent value there but not much value in Hayward-bey.
|
|
|
|
Post by Patriots on Jul 18, 2013 16:55:59 GMT -5
Again the vote was 3-2 in favor of approval.....good thing all these players stink
|
|
Texans
Junior Member
Posts: 53 
|
Post by Texans on Jul 19, 2013 8:24:29 GMT -5
Good to see Grant got another trade approved
|
|
